Skip to main content
PNISAN Republic of Burundi National Food Security and Nutrition Information Platform

Quick search

Food security ALI-05 Validated official value

Proportion of households consuming iodized salt

Households whose tested salt contains iodine. An increase in this indicator reflects an improvement of the situation.

National trend

99,0 % in 2016

99,0 %2016

Only one national measurement is published so far. The trend line will appear with the next validation.

Data table : Proportion of households consuming iodized salt
Period Value (%) Status Source Validated on
2016 99,0 Official EDSB-III 2016-2017 (opens in a new window) Original source (opens in a new window)

Territorial comparison

Situation by province

11 provinces out of 18 above the national value. The gap between Gitega and Cankuzo reaches 3,3 pts.

Gitega, most favourable situation
100,0 %
Cankuzo, least favourable situation
96,7 %
provinces above the national value (99,0 %)
11 of 18
Map: Proportion of households consuming iodized salt, 2016-2017
Darker: more favourable
  1. 96,7 to 98,7 %
  2. 98,7 to 99,0 %
  3. 99,0 to 99,2 %
  4. 99,2 to 99,7 %
  5. 99,7 to 100,0 %

Province ranking, 2016-2017

From most to least favourable: a high value is favourable.

  1. Gitega 100,0 more favourable than the national value
  2. Rumonge 100,0 more favourable than the national value
  3. Rutana 99,9 more favourable than the national value
  4. Kayanza 99,7 more favourable than the national value
  5. Bujumbura Mairie 99,6 more favourable than the national value
  6. Bururi 99,6 more favourable than the national value
  7. Bujumbura Rural 99,2 more favourable than the national value
  8. Muramvya 99,2 more favourable than the national value
  9. Mwaro 99,2 more favourable than the national value
  10. Kirundo 99,1 more favourable than the national value
  11. Muyinga 99,1 more favourable than the national value
  12. Bubanza 98,8 less favourable than the national value
  13. Karusi 98,8 less favourable than the national value
  14. Makamba 98,8 less favourable than the national value
  15. Ngozi 98,7 less favourable than the national value
  16. Ruyigi 98,6 less favourable than the national value
  17. Cibitoke 98,5 less favourable than the national value
  18. Cankuzo 96,7 less favourable than the national value

More favourable than national Less favourable Vertical line: national, 99,0

Province ranking, 2016-2017
Rank Province Value (%) Gap to national
1 Gitega 100,0 +1,0
2 Rumonge 100,0 +1,0
3 Rutana 99,9 +0,9
4 Kayanza 99,7 +0,7
5 Bujumbura Mairie 99,6 +0,6
6 Bururi 99,6 +0,6
7 Bujumbura Rural 99,2 +0,2
8 Muramvya 99,2 +0,2
9 Mwaro 99,2 +0,2
10 Kirundo 99,1 +0,1
11 Muyinga 99,1 +0,1
12 Bubanza 98,8 −0,2
13 Karusi 98,8 −0,2
14 Makamba 98,8 −0,2
15 Ngozi 98,7 −0,3
16 Ruyigi 98,6 −0,4
17 Cibitoke 98,5 −0,5
18 Cankuzo 96,7 −2,3

Breakdowns

Gaps across population groups

By area of residence

2016-2017, percentage

  • Urban : 2016-2017 99,5
  • Rural : 2016-2017 99,1

Gap between Urban and Rural in 2016-2017: 0,4 pts

Definition and calculation

Methodology and metadata

Definition

Households whose tested salt contains iodine

Calculation method

(Households with iodized salt) / (Households whose salt was tested) x 100

Numerator

Households with iodized salt

Denominator

Households whose salt was tested

Metadata

Code
ALI-05
System
Food security
Unit
Percentage
Frequency
Five-yearly
Reference source
DHS
Data sources
All sources
Reading direction
An increase in this indicator reflects an improvement of the situation.
Version
1

Open data

Download, cite, embed

CSV file National series and provincial values, with sources and validation dates. Food security catalogue (CSV) Latest value of every indicator in the same system.
Code to copy into a website or an online report.
Cite this indicator
PNISAN (2026). Proportion of households consuming iodized salt, ALI-05. National Food Security and Nutrition Information Platform. pnisan.bi/indicateurs/65

Reuse terms: Open licence, free reuse with attribution of the source: PNISAN, SEP/PMSAN